This statuette depicts Alexander the Great in contrapposto with his left leg extended and bent slightly forward. His right arm is raised and bent upwards, likely once holding a weapon,...
This statuette depicts Alexander the Great in contrapposto with his left leg extended and bent slightly forward. His right arm is raised and bent upwards, likely once holding a weapon, his forearm and attribute now missing. His left arm is intact and is held lower with a bend at the elbow and his cloak wrapped over his forearm. His left fingers curl round and may also have held a weapon, now missing. He is otherwise depicted in heroic nudity, alluding to the divinity of the figure. His portrait features are distinctively those of Alexander, with his wide-eyed high cast gaze, straight nose, strong brow, and slightly parted pouted lips. His head is twisted to the right further highlighting the movement and dynamism of the figure. The thick wavy curls of his coiffure, known as the anastole hairstyle, are also characteristic of Alexander.
Schlomo Moussaieff (1925 - 2015) Collection, Israel and London, formed between 1948 - 2000
Gorny and Mosch, Munich, 13 December 2017, lot 267
Private collection, acquired from the above
Literature
The figure appears close to the Alexander Doryphoros type of Alexander holding his spear, usually with a short sword (parazonium) in his other. These smaller bronzes are copies of, or inspired by an original attributed to Lysippos, the court sculptor to Alexander the Great. They assert an image of a king whose authority over his ‘spear-won’ land is a gift from the gods. This example is a highly muscular rendering, and a variant on the traditional Doryphoros as although he likely originally held a spear, there are drilled holes in the raised right arm for insertion of a separate, now lost, attribute.
According to Andrew Stewart, such statues ‘simultaneously flaunted the source of his power (his physical and martial prowess) and served as icons of his personal dominion over Asia [….]. By successfully manipulating Greek society’s central symbolic form, these portraits transformed the nude, youthful, heroic victor of surpassing arete into the charismatic young king of Asia’: A. Stewart, Faces of Power, Alexander’s Image and Hellenistic Politics, Berkeley, 1993, p. 167.
This bronze must be seen in the light of this iconography. According closely with the various surviving types of Alexander Doryphoros bronzes, the subject may certainly be seen as Alexander. For another example in Stanford University, California (acc. no. 1975.47), see D. Pandermalis, Alexander the Great– Treasures from an Epic Era of Hellenism, New York, 2004, fig. 5.
The image of Alexander through his program of portrait sculpture conveys a multitude of messages but the Alexander Doryphoros encapsulates his assertion of martial arete, his god-given personal power and victory; it is a potent symbol of a conqueror, of his dominion, in an unequivocal visual language entirely understood by the ancient Greek viewer. For further discussion see A. Stewart, Faces of Power, Alexander’s Image and Hellenistic Politics, Berkeley, 1993; M. Bieber, Alexander the Great in Greek and Roman Art, Chicago, 1964.